Log In | Register
This is pursuant to my article "We don't need to tax" here: (the following URL is long and has to start under the ad block)--> http://thegoldenrulename.newsvine.com/_news/2011/03/09/6228928-we-dont-need-to-tax . Which is an emanation of my 11-11-08 "The best economic plan": http://www.the-goldenrule.name/11-11-08__The_best_economic_plan.htm , which was obviously the cause of Obama's drastic spending plan reversal, which is probably the only thing that has helped this economy so far. Completing its entirety would solve the entire problem instantly.
I think the above articles are the solution that those Occupy activists ("We are the 99%") are looking for. It will stay hidden here, however, until the media begins to inquire authorities about it. ("Hidden" from the American public.)
You see, raising taxes against the rich is all and well, but that's not going to make employers pay basic workers more. If anything, it will cause employers to have to pay them less. Plus, increasing taxes against the rich isn't going to allow the government to pay more to welfare recipients, as they will never want to pay them any more than absolutely necessary, while thinking less will motivate them more to get a job. But, welfare recipients today are actually motivated to not get a job psychologically when they are told they will have to give up the free money once employed, especially when the government purposely makes it hard for them to get the welfare, food stamps, inexpensive housing, etc. in the first place. Instead, welfare recipients just want to make the welfare work, knowing how hard it'd be to get back on it if they got a job then became unemployed again. (Yes, a rock is smarter than our government.) But, if we allowed them to keep the welfare AND have a job, they'd have NO REASON to not want to work for "more." And, employers wouldn't have to pay them more, just enough to keep them coming into work. As a result, basic wage working people would end up with more, leaving only "stupid" people to stay home on welfare where they should be, as they cause more problems than good in the workforce, especially when they get into management. Have you ever spent hours on the phone with technical support "experts" who don't know diddly about their product or service and will continue to guess illogical contradictions, just so they don't have to lose points by having to summon someone else? If only smart people were available for companies to hire, we'd have our answers and be off the phone in about five minutes, saving both us and the employers lots of money. And, we'd probably reduce government to one-tenth the size while getting everything right the first time (as the government hires a lot of dumb people). But, today, those are the kinds of people we only think we want working. If we could actually lessen this huge amount of waste and corruption in today's work force, by allowing a welfare option to all, then likely also all the frivolous, fraudulent and deceptive products out there today can disappear, as less selfish people will "need" to work also: the kind who want everything given to them. That's right, they can sit back and be home by themselves the rest of their lives, just to keep them out of everyone else's hair. Pride in products or services was also much better in like the 1950s (when most women didn't work), thereby having less overall workers to make what was necessary. Today, when we make something better, requiring less people to make it, things overall just get worse as a result because of it. And, if companies that have reached their apex, like Microsoft, could just go out of business and quit trying to antiquate everyone else's old reliable programs, we'd ALL be MUCH better off! Just PAY them to all stay home. Really! Instead, today's government thinks it's great for those people to have jobs. NO, it's NOT! (I don't know about the rest of you, but when I turn Windows Updates off, I have a lot less problems with my Windows XP; and, logic dictates that if a company can mess up its older operating systems, people will want to purchase their newer ones quicker. But, these wasteful cycles can never end until something changes.)
Remember the 1949 Ford? I knew a guy that did neutral slams in the thing (in 1972) just to show me how it wouldn't hurt a thing. It just kept running like a top. Unbelievable!
Again, there is NOTHING that is going to give more to the little man than my plan. You say: No one will work if we pay them all say $25,000 a year for doing nothing, then no one will have anything. Yes they will work, because they could make an additional $25,000 a year working. Then they'd end up with $50,000 a year. Isn't that the liberal goal? Robin Hood's and Jesus' also! How many guys who earn $50,000 a year, only want to work half the year for only $25,000 (basic needs)? Probably none. High school students will even work an evening job in addition to having to go to school all day and study. Why (when they don't have to for basic needs)? For "more." It's because gravy tastes lots better than plain potatoes. With my plan, incentive and enthusiasm (and, in doing a better job) should amplify, as better paid people are always happier and more motivated people. Crime from the ghetto should lessen a lot!
And, Occupy activists alone are in no way going to be able to get individuals to become less greedy, selfish and dishonest until the Church supports Jesus' true fear of God teachings (instead of "Jesus paid our penalties" cop-outs). And, I don't believe Occupy is anywhere close to being religious. I mean, they might be able to stop one or two bad rich people today, but there's no way they can stop all the others and / especially down the road. The key is the correct teaching of Jesus. The money (the evil) controls what churches teach today (or they'd get lots less money). Liberals would love the real Christ -- the one in the Bible. EVERYONE seems to be fooled by today's Church verbal discourse, even to the point that what's truly Godly becomes taboo; so much that today's atheists are ignorantly growing in numbers. It's pathetic.
But, I'm on top of it all.
The Goldenrule Name ( http://www.the-goldenrule.name/ )
