Newt Gingrich's successful spin (by audience applause) against CNN debate moderator John King amazed me Thursday evening when King didn't defend his castigation by reminding Gingrich how Gingrich was one of the people leading the impeachment proceedings against Clinton for his minor Monica Lewinski fling. If I was King, I would have quickly defended myself with the one statement of fact that would have actually reversed the degradation.
Plus, Gingrich's affair was much worse / evil / victimizing / "despicable" than Clinton's. First of all, since Hillary stated she was okay with it, there was absolutely no victim in Clinton's passing fling with Lewinski. But, not only did Gingrich's second wife state she wasn't okay with an "open marriage" or the affair, making her a true victim (to today's marriage expectations / dependencies), but Gingrich's affair was a full on-going affair, not just a one night stand; therefore, MUCH WORSE and much more threatening and victimizing to Marianne, Gingrich's second wife. Moreover, that affair was so bad that it was the cause for the divorce, thereby making Marianne even more victimized. Therefore, not only is Fair Afterlife Suffering waiting for Gingrich, but the true wrong in the essence of adultery is what our [extremely intelligent] public should be more concerned with, when it comes to a candidate's integrity and consideration for others.
When people mess with the golden rule, they're going to get an "explanation" why they were wrong. Since NO ONE really has the slightest idea of right and wrong, I HAVE TO BE the one to tell it. Why is that?
As a result, what Gingrich stated Thursday evening just justified Clinton's lying about his affair, as such was just personal victimless media and partisan fluff just TO CAUSE victimization where there was none.
The Goldenrule Name